1. Welcome to Pit Bull Chat!

    We are a diverse group of Pit Bull enthusiasts devoted to the preservation of the American Pit Bull Terrier.

    Our educational and informational discussion forum about the American Pit Bull Terrier and all other bull breeds is a venue for members to discuss topics, share ideas and come together with the common goal to preserve and promote our canine breed of choice.

    Here you will find discussions on topics concerning health, training, events, rescue, breed specific legislation and history. We are the premier forum for America’s dog, The American Pit Bull Terrier.

    We welcome you and invite you to join our family.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

    Dismiss Notice

Writing Effective Letters To Officials

Discussion in 'BSL Letter Writing Tips' started by Vicki, Jun 30, 2008.

  1. Vicki

    Vicki Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    From: http://fightbsl.tripod.com/id2.html

    [FONT=Times New Roman,Times,serif]Writing effective letters to officials[/FONT]​

    [FONT=Times New Roman,Times,serif]One of the most difficult things for those new to fighting BSL is expressing your feelings to the legislators and/or other officials who have proposed it. There are some very important things to remember when communicating with officials: [/FONT]

    First and foremost, ALWAYS BE POLITE AND RESPECTFUL in all your communications with officials. Don't be combative or argumentative regardless of the difference between your point of view and theirs. Our dogs are worth putting your personal feelings of anger aside in order to communicate effectively.

    Stick to the facts. Try to avoid being emotional. It is a given that you love your dogs or you wouldn't be fighting for them. The simple truth is, the officials do not care how much we love our dogs -- they care about the safety of their constituents and their community. To that end, the facts related to the inefficiency of breed specific legislation and the integral part that irresponsible owners play in dog attacks are important facts to get across to them.

    Money talks. One thing that always catches the ear of officials is cost. Reinforce the fact that breed specific laws cost a lot of money - additional animal control, shelters fees, vetting, litigation, etc. The bottom line is simple... BSL costs tax payers A LOT of money!

    Breed identification. Another important flaw with breed specific laws is breed identification. There are a minimum of twenty-five (25) breeds that possess the physical traits of 'pit bulls.' Breed identification by animal control officers is subjective and, therefore, opens the city up to a liability issues in the event of mistaken identification. The "Find the Pit Bull" game is an excellent tool to demonstrate the difficulty of identifying 'pit bulls."

    General letter writing tips:
    • [FONT=Times New Roman,Times,serif]It is not necessary to type your letter. In fact, a handwritten letter has a tremendous impact. (As long as its legible!) Even a postcard is fine, as long as it's nott the pre-printed "form" card. [/FONT]
    • [FONT=Times New Roman,Times,serif]Be brief and to the point. Try to limit your letter to one or two subjects. Include all bill titles and numbers whenever possible. [/FONT]
    • [FONT=Times New Roman,Times,serif]Send your letter as soon as you hear about an issue or bill. If it comes up again later in the session, you can always write again or make a phone call. [/FONT]
    • [FONT=Times New Roman,Times,serif]During the legislative session, send letters to the State Capitol building. During the interim, send letters to the legislators' home addresses. [/FONT]
    [FONT=Times New Roman,Times,serif]Below are some form letters (ranging from very simple to quite detailed) which oppose BSL that you can modify to fit your current situation and send to officials. [/FONT]

    * * * * * * *

    [FONT=Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif][FONT=Times New Roman,Times,serif]Simple Letter[/FONT]

    The Honorable John Q. Official
    State Capital
    Nashville, Tennessee

    Re: House/Sentate Bill No. [or] Proposed orginance on

    Dear :

    I am writing to you about House/Senate Bill No. [or] the proposed ordinance on [specify details of ordinance]. I am strongly opposed to this [bill/ordinance] and ask that you vote against it. Passage of this bill will not address the root cause of the problem, and it will have a negative impact on responsible, law abiding dog owners while those who do not abide by the law will simply continue to do so.

    Thank you for your time and consideration.


    Letter #2


    I am writing in response to the pending resolution regarding regulations specific to [targeted breed] with the use of breed specific legislation in [your town].

    ANY dog can become a problem for the public if the dog is allowed to run loose and is not supervised. The key word is responsible. Webster's definition of responsibility is: Being legally or ethically accountable for the welfare or care of another. To say [targeted breed] are dangerous does not address the real problem - irresponsible owners.

    Please reconsider and retract your breed specific resolution. Please do not punish responsible owners who maintain their dogs as companions and members of the family; dogs that do not pose a threat to anyone. Why should we be punished simply because irresponsible owners of the same breed of dog have not "ethically and legally" protected others from injury?

    Please provide our community with non-breed specific legislation that is competent to regulate the irresponsible owners and protect those who maintain their dogs safely and humanely. Please provide definitions for vicious and/or potentially dangerous with measurable actions which cannot be questioned or misinterpreted due to bias.

    The irresponsible owners do not care what breed of dog they lose the right to own - they'll find another breed of dog to fit their needs. As a responsible owner, I ask you to seriously consider the impact of breed-specific legislation.


    [FONT=Times New Roman,Times,serif]Detailed Letter[/FONT]​

    [FONT=Times New Roman,Times,serif]Dear:[/FONT]

    [FONT=Times New Roman,Times,serif]To be useful, legislation must be effective, enforceable, economical, and reasonably fair. Recently, a resolution has been placed before you that fails all of these tests. This legislation is motivated by fear and lack of relevant knowledge. It is discriminatory, impractical, and unenforceable. Worst of all, it will not solve the problem. I urge you to vote against it. [/FONT]

    [FONT=Times New Roman,Times,serif]The proposed bill would restrict the ownership of certain types of dogs, specifically [targeted breed]. [/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman,Times,serif]These breeds have been the subject of irresponsible and sensationalist reporting across the country. The media and the inexperienced would have you believe that these breeds are vicious and should be prohibited. [/FONT]

    [FONT=Times New Roman,Times,serif]The plain fact is that there is no relationship between the type of the dog and the number of incidents. If your town has 100 German Shepherds and 1 Poodle, you'll soon learn that the German Shepherds are responsible for 100 times as many incidents as the Poodles. Does this mean that German Shepherds are intrinsically vicious? Of course not. [/FONT]

    [FONT=Times New Roman,Times,serif]Taken as a whole, [targeted breed] [/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman,Times,serif]have proven their stability and good canine citizenry by becoming 'Search & Rescue dogs, Therapy dogs working inside hospitals, and family companions for years. A five year study published in the Cincinnati Law Review in 1982, vol. 53, pg 1077, which specifically considered both Rottweilers and "pit bulls," concluded in part that: - statistics do not support the assertion that any one breed was dangerous, - when legislation is focused on the type of dog it fails, because it is ... unenforceable, confusing, and costly. - focusing legislation on dogs that are "vicious" distracts attention from the real problem, which is irresponsible owners. [/FONT]

    [FONT=Times New Roman,Times,serif]In light of the studies, the facts, and the discriminatory nature of the proposed legislation, we urge you to take the following actions: [/FONT]

    [FONT=Times New Roman,Times,serif]1. Reject the current legislation, which is contrary to fact and distracts from the real issue: responsible ownership. [/FONT]

    [FONT=Times New Roman,Times,serif]2. Work to establish reasonable guidelines for responsible pet ownership, and encourage legislation that supports owner responsibility without reference to specific breeds. [/FONT]

    [FONT=Times New Roman,Times,serif]Study after study shows that ANY dog, regardless of breed, will be whatever its owner makes of it....nothing more, nothing less. Owners can and should take responsibility for their pets. We suggest that the appropriate policy is "blame the owner, not the dog." If a dog attacks a person, the law should treat it as though the owner attacked that person. [/FONT]

    [FONT=Times New Roman,Times,serif]Voting for this proposal as it stands will harm both the law abiding, responsible dog owners and the victims, but it won't solve anything. [/FONT]

    [FONT=Times New Roman,Times,serif]Respectfully,[/FONT]

  2. xxpitloverxx

    xxpitloverxx Little Dog

    Awesome Purple! This will be a forever useful tool to everyone in this community... Thanks for the find and sharing!

Share This Page