1. Welcome to Pit Bull Chat!

    We are a diverse group of Pit Bull enthusiasts devoted to the preservation of the American Pit Bull Terrier.

    Our educational and informational discussion forum about the American Pit Bull Terrier and all other bull breeds is a venue for members to discuss topics, share ideas and come together with the common goal to preserve and promote our canine breed of choice.

    Here you will find discussions on topics concerning health, training, events, rescue, breed specific legislation and history. We are the premier forum for America’s dog, The American Pit Bull Terrier.

    We welcome you and invite you to join our family.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

    Dismiss Notice

Jurupa Valley CA rejects breed based spay/neuter law

Discussion in 'Breed Specific Legislation' started by StopBSL.com, Jun 12, 2014.

  1. StopBSL.com

    StopBSL.com StopBSL.com RSS Feed

    At their last meeting, officials in Jurupa Valley, California, decided against a proposal that would require the pediatric mandatory sterilization of dogs deemed to be pit bulls.
    The proposal was brought forward by Councilman*Micheal Goodland. *Goodland made it very clear that this was not about shelter numbers, or population issues. *He is quoted in local reports, calling “pit bulls” wild animals and has stated openly that he would like to see a breed ban in place.
    This follows what we have seen in California communities, where one council member makes extremely strong claims about “vicious animals” or “wild animals” and “protecting the community,” while at the same time saying that it is a shelter issue.
    There were 2 votes for the proposal, and 3 against.
    Two of those who voted against the proposal stated it was an issue of rights for them. *Johnston and Roughton said they could vote to take away the right of dog owners to keep their animals intact.
    The other vote for the proposal, aside from Goodman who sponsored it, cited dog attacks as the reason for voting for it, claiming the spay/neuter law would reduce attacks.
    As more and more research into the issue of dog attacks and the dogs sexual status emerges, we are seeing stronger correlations to the way the dog is generally cared for, sexual status being an indicator of that.
    The 2 part proposal contained the mandatory sterilization of “pit bulls” as well as a*proposed marketing campaign urging responsible dog ownership, including voluntary sterilization, licensing and microchipping of pets.
    These sorts of campaigns have proven to be incredibly successful, but only when the municipality provides information on how to access these resources.
    We hope that the council revisits the campaign, as well as looking into providing resources to low income communities, which are the most impacted in these situations.

    Filed under: BSL Rejected [​IMG] [​IMG][​IMG]

    More from StopBSL.com...
     

Share This Page