[RDOWS]

Town of Parachute
P. O. Box 100
Parachute, CO 81635

-OR-

Parachute Town Hall,
222 Grand Valley Way,
Parachute, CO 81635
970-285-7630



Parachute ponders pit bull prohibition



By Heidi Rice
December 12, 2007



PARACHUTE - A potential pit bull ban in the town of Parachute has a number of people up in arms and planning to attend the second reading of the proposed ordinance at 6:30 p.m. Thursday.

The ban, which would prohibit anyone within town limits from possessing a pit bull, was proposed by town board member Linda Waite.

"Existing pit bulls could remain in town," said Mayor Roy McClung. "But there would be criteria in that they would have to be licensed and registered and sterilized (neutered or spayed). There would be no new pit bulls allowed, and breeding would be prohibited."

McClung said the police department estimated there were about 15-20 pit bulls within Parachute town limits.

Those who work at animal shelters said the ban will not accomplish anything but putting more stress on area shelters when people have to get rid of their pit bulls.

"This is not going to help," said Andrea Rueter of Valley Dog Rescue in Carbondale. "The hysteria (about pit bulls) is bad enough already. Personally, I feel the problem is the breeding of the pit bulls."

Char Quinn, director of the Eagle Valley Humane Society, said she feels Parachute's proposed ordinance is not only wrong, but illegal.

As an agent for the Bureau of Animal Protection under the Colorado Department of Agriculture, she cites Colorado Revised Statute 18-9-204.5, titled "Unlawful Ownership of a Dangerous Dog."

"Here is part of the statute," Quinn wrote in a mass e-mail to other animal activists in the valley where she cited the following from the Colorado Revised Statutes.

"(5)(a) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a municipality from adopting any rule or law for the control of dangerous dogs; except that any such rule or law shall not regulate dangerous dogs in a manner that is specific to breed.

"(b) Nothing in this section shall be construed to abrogate a county's authority under part 1 of article 15 of title 30, C.R.S., to adopt dog control and licensing resolutions and to impose the penalties set forth in section 30-15-102. C.R.S.; except that any such resolution shall not regulate dangerous dogs in a manner that is specific to breed."

According to Quinn, a "dangerous dog" is defined as a "dog that has inflicted serious bodily injury or death of a person or a domestic animal."

"The problem is, there are bad dogs, but it doesn't matter what breed it is," Quinn said. "It's not the breed, it's the owner. This is completely prejudicial. A lot of people get dogs for the wrong reasons. I'm very against banning a breed."

And although Parachute's proposed ban in Garfield County is quite a distance from Eagle County, Quinn said the repercussions will filter down.

"It's not our county, but it will affect us here," she said. "There are about 30-40 breeds that even look like pit bulls. I get e-mails at the Humane Society at least once or twice a month of pit bull puppies that are going to be euthanized."

The Parachute meeting will begin at 6:30 p.m. on Thursday at Parachute Town Hall, 222 Grand Valley Way.

http://www.postindependent.com/article/20071212/VALLEYNEWS/112120055

[Lucy Loo]

What I don't understand is, if there is a state law PROHIBITING BSL in Colorado, how is it that Denver is able to literally confiscate Pit Bulls from their owners? Was this law passed before or after the Denver fiasco?

This is also happening in Florida, where BSL is illegal. However, there are several counties and cities that at this moment are trying to pass Breed Specific Legislation. Currently, they are having to table their measures because Florida Statutes prohibit it. So now we have some idiot representative from Broward County trying to re-write the Florida Statutes to ALLOW BSL.

When will the witch hunt end?

[crazypitbull]

Originally Posted by Lucy Loo What I don't understand is, if there is a state law PROHIBITING BSL in Colorado, how is it that Denver is able to literally confiscate Pit Bulls from their owners? Was this law passed before or after the Denver fiasco? ... When will the witch hunt end?

because "home rule" trumps state law. The Colorado Supreme Court ruled that Denver could keep its ban, and no one has tried to test the home rule issue in court.

[Purple]

Parachute town trustees let pit bull ordinance die


PARACHUTE, Colo. (AP) - Pit bull owners in Parachute will be allowed to keep their animals for now, but any animal deemed "vicious" will likely face stricter regulations before long.

Town trustees last night let die a proposed ordinance that would have banned pit bulls except in cases where owners agreed to abide by various restrictions. One motion to approve the ordinance would have broadened the measure to include breeds such as Rottweilers and Dobermans.

It died for the lack of a second.

But trustees agreed to ask that assistant town attorney Ed Sands draft a new ordinance, one that would make existing ordinances on vicious and stray animals tougher.

Trustee Linda Waite says she proposed the tougher restrictions due to the fear some people feel over pit bulls.

http://kjct8.com/Global/story.asp?S=7497359

[crazypitbull]

I read in another news story that the ACO for the county is a pit bull owner, and spoke against the ordinance