Pit Bull Forum

Breed Specific Legislation

Stories, petitions, updates and strategies for the fight against BSL

Forum to discuss pit bull dogs and topics about BSL, health, training, events, rescue and history. Forums provide education by discussion among experienced pit bull breed owners and lovers.
Home| Forums| Rescue| Reviews| Blogs| Chat| Links| Pictures | Policies | Store | Pit Bull Chat's RSS Feeds
Join our community!
Tags| FAQ| Calendar| Active Threads | Search
Go Back   Pit Bull Chat Forum > Pit Bull Forums > Breed Specific Legislation
Read about our new Controversial and Heated Debates forum. Send a private message to Shon to find out how to get an email@pitbull-chat.com email address! Interested in cats? Check out our new Feline Forum.
Welcome to Pit Bull Chat!

We are a diverse community of pit bull advocates who strive to educate ourselves and others about the pit bull breeds. Through diversity, we gain perspectives and opinions from all walks of life and all around the world.

Our community covers a wide array of topics that affect pet pit bull owners of today. You will find forums referencing health, training, behavior, shows, rescue and adoption.

We also are concerned with the laws and specific legislation that affect the pit bull and bully related breeds. Our Breed Specific Legislation and Pit Bulls in the News forums are kept current and up to date to keep you abreast of current events and legislation and how it may affect you and your dogs.

We welcome not only pit bull owners and fanciers, but all bully breed enthusiasts, including owners of Bull Terriers, the American Bully, the American Staffordshire Terrier and the Staffordshire Bull Terrier.

Our community also loves pictures! You can browse through several categories of pictures posted by members by clicking the link above. You can also register with our community and share pictures of your dog! We love pictures and would love for you to share yours!

If this is your first visit with us, or even if you have been browsing around, we urge you to register and join our community! Registration is completely free and allows you more access to the site. Once you are a member, you can interact with others and share your experience, knowledge and pictures of your dog!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 05-08-2007, 08:47 PM
Purple's Avatar
Purple Purple is offline
Administrator
 
My Mood: Busy
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,630
Images: 202
Send a message via AIM to Purple
Default Arkansas-Batesville Council To Hear Pit Bull Concerns

Council to hear pit bull concerns
By Andrea Bruner, Assistant Managing Editor
News | Published on Monday May 7, 2007
Batesville has a bigger problem with pit bulls than any other breed of dog; in fact, Animal Control Officer Jeff Pender says 60 percent of his nuisance dog calls are about pit bulls.
Tuesday night, the Batesville City Council is scheduled to hear from Pender, who will bring a proposed ordinance that would limit the number of pit bull terriers and pit bull mixes an owner may keep (and they must be spayed or neutered) and prevent others from moving in. This, he said, would eventually lead to no pit bulls in the city.
However, there may be some resistance on the city council, as some aldermen say the city already has a vicious animal ordinance.
Pender said the vicious animal ordinance defines such an animal as one that “has a known disposition or tendency to attack, to cause injury or to otherwise endanger the safety of human beings or domestic animals; however, the fact that an animal has bitten or attempted to bite some person that was teasing the animal shall not constitute the animal a vicious animal within the meaning of this ordinance.”
Batesville city code prohibits vicious animals.
Pender said the vicious animal ban is not enough; the current code targets those already “known,” not the ones that “could.”
Too many, he said, can get off their chains. The proposed ordinance would require a minimum of a 10-by-10-foot (per animal) chain link pen with a lock.
“I get calls from the post office and the public” about pit bulls, more than any other breed, Pender said.
“More of my neglect and abuse cases are pit bulls. More of my aggressive dog calls are pit bulls. More of my running at large cases are pit bulls,” he continued.
“When I get a call after hours or on weekends, it’s for pit bulls. Most of the common house dogs, people aren’t afraid of.”
He said there was a case recently on Rounds Road, outside the city limits, in which a 4-year-old girl was attacked by a pit bull and required multiple stitches on her face. There have been other instances of attacks in this county and others, Pender said.
Pender, who raised pit bulls himself for about 20 years, also said not all of Batesville’s pit bulls are bad, but they are a big concern. “I have folks that have good dogs, but they’re (owned by) good folks. And then I have dogs that are bad. ... It’s all in how they’re raised.”
He’s seen five or six dogs kept in a yard barely big enough for two, he added. There have also been instances of illegal dog fighting, he said, but he has yet to have enough evidence to prosecute. Still, he can tell by wounds, cuts and scars on some pit bulls’ faces.
Pit bulls have been a problem “since the day I took the job” in April 2002, he said.
For now, though, Pender stressed this is not a total ban; it would start out by limiting the number of pit bulls one owner or household can have to two.
“I’m trying to control the population,” he told the Guard. “I didn’t want to draw a line in the sand and say, ‘No more pit bulls,’ ... (but) I didn’t want them running rampant. ...
“I’m just trying to take better control of the animals I have. ... If I don’t take a stand now and somebody gets hurt in the city, that doesn’t say much for me.”
Furthermore, if the council passes the ordinance, no more pit bulls would be allowed to be brought into the city.
The council will meet at 5:30 p.m. Tuesday in city hall.
The agenda also includes utilities business, consideration of the city’s joining the Arkansas Public Employees Retirement System, presentations from James Brazier regarding broadband wireless and Dustin Wish regarding Indco.net and a review of bills.
Any citizen may address the council with comments or concerns under the “Comments from Citizens” portion of the agenda.

http://www.guardonline.com/?module=d...11&format=html
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-09-2007, 02:34 PM
DryCreek DryCreek is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 159
Default

Pender, who raised pit bulls himself for about 20 years, also said not all of Batesville’s pit bulls are bad, but they are a big concern. “I have folks that have good dogs, but they’re (owned by) good folks. And then I have dogs that are bad. ... It’s all in how they’re raised.”
For now, though, Pender stressed this is not a total ban; it would start out by limiting the number of pit bulls one owner or household can have to two.
“I’m trying to control the population,” he told the Guard. “I didn’t want to draw a line in the sand and say, ‘No more pit bulls,’ ... (but) I didn’t want them running rampant. ...
Hypocrite......
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-09-2007, 02:43 PM
Turner's Avatar
Turner Turner is offline
Moderator
 
My Mood: Stuck
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,842
Blog Entries: 2
Default

Originally Posted by DryCreek View Post
Hypocrite......
Arent they all? Hope all goes well...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-11-2007, 01:40 AM
bahamutt99's Avatar
bahamutt99 bahamutt99 is offline
Its dark in this cave...
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Somewhere between Mexico and New Mexico
Posts: 1,872
Default

Batesville decided against BSL at their meeting, but they could probably use some encouragement in passing stronger laws to make their citizens happy.

New info I just got:
The Batesville, Arkansas council looked at an ordinance that was breed specific for pit bull terriers and pit bull mixes at their council meeting last night. However, the council did not like the ordinance and did not consider it.

Most of the council members are going to a Municipal League meeting next month and plan on comparing the animal control ordinances of other cities to see how they deal with vicious dogs.

The city clerk advises that she believes most of the council would like to have an ordinance that IS NOT breed specific, but this does not mean BSL is off the table. We will have to check back next month.

In the meantime, it may be a good idea to forward the council some good, generic dangerous dog ordinances and make POLITE suggestions to them regarding the same.

Jodi
Here are email contacts:

CIty Clerk
Denise M. Johnston, City Clerk / Treasurer
1167 E. College Street
Batesville, AR 72501
(870) 698-2400
clerk@cityofbatesville.com


Mayor
Rick Elumbaugh, Mayor
#1 Lake Oak Drive
Batesville, AR 72501
(870) 612-7946mayor@cityofbatesville.com


City Attorney
Scott Stalker, City Attorney
480 S. 23rd Street
Batesville, AR 72501
(870) 612-5569
attorney@cityofbatesville.com

City Council
w1p1@cityofbatesville.com
w1p2@cityofbatesville.com
w2p1@cityofbatesville.com
w3p1@cityofbatesville.com
w3p2@cityofbatesville.com
w4p1@cityofbatesville.com
w4p2@cityofbatesville.com
__________________
***
Lindsay
"I don't want to waste another day stuck in the shadow of my mistakes."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Pit Bull Chat Forum > Pit Bull Forums > Breed Specific Legislation > Arkansas-Batesville Council To Hear Pit Bull Concerns

Thread Tools


Follow us on:


Page Strength: 4.0
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All posts and photos become the property of Pitbull-Chat.com and may not be reprinted without written permission from the original author or Pitbull-Chat.com.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95