Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 32
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,577
    Images
    1

    Los Angeles dogs have to be licensed

    Canine crooks, Los Angeles dogs have to be licensed

    February 24, 8:57 AMLA Headlines ExaminerKasey Jones











    Dogs at William S. Hart park, in West Hollywood. Tuesday, Feb. 16, 2010.
    AP Photo/Reed Saxon



    The city of Los Angeles in in the middle of a $212 million budget shortfall, projected to more than double next year and as a result the city wants your pooch accounted for.
    Cutting education budgets and firing employees left and right isn't enough, now officials are going after any unlicensed dogs.

    If all dogs become licensed there's an estimated $3.6 million in revenue for the nearly bankrupt city.
    According to City Council President Eric Garcetti, around two-thirds of the city's dogs are unlicensed. The cost of licenses are $15 for a sterilized dog and $100 for an unaltered pet.

    For the hundreds of thousands of dogs that are possibly unlicensed in Los Angeles, the city has hired a mere 8 full time people to track down these canine crooks. It's safe to mention Los Angeles has a 15 per cent jobless rate -- one of the highest of any major US city. Maybe these 8 will help?
    In order to find the dogs, the 8 employees will talk with the Department of Water and Power, which keeps track of homes with dogs.
    Officials are going to great lengths to get a handle on the city's budget and economic crisis.
    "The last time we saw this kind of drop in revenue was the Great Depression," Miguel Santana, the city's chief financial officer, said. "It speaks to how severe this budget crisis is."

  2. #2
    They are doing this all over California, in Kern County they are going door to door giving 30 day notices to people who have unlicensed dogs, after 30 days if its not done they will be charged a $375 fine per dog.
    A easy $15 is nothing, but what about the ones that don't have altered pets? Kern County wants $60 for a license for an unaltered pet. It also has a lot of low income people, a lot of people who can't afford to spay or neuter their animals,(we have a mobile clinic that is booked all the way up till May who charge $40 for dogs and $20 for cats, they do not offer free s/n here like they do in LA) and IMO if you can't afford that you shouldn't even have a pet, but that's not the case, people who can't even feed themselves here have pets. I would see offering some $#@!istance for the licensing but yet the counties are just starving for money... Its a no win situation for some of these people.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,577
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Jewelz View Post
    after 30 days if its not done they will be charged a $375 fine per dog.
    Kern County wants $60 for a license for an unaltered pet.
    :eek: WOW !!!

    Where I am it's $12.50 for altered, $25.00 for intact

  4. #4
    See that sounds much more reasonable. California is ridiculous when it comes down to money situations, they always want us to pay more for everything except milk. lol

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    4,179
    Images
    4
    If memory serves, the city of of West Hollywood, CA recently sent ACOs door to door, to check for licensing status of pet dogs.

    It's a trend that will travel across our cash starved state.

    Quite frankly, I am all for it. As a responsible dog owner, it's the least you can do. In our suburban (L.A.) town, we pay about $16.00 per altered dog; and about $25.00 per intact dog.

    If I look at the ever-present feral cat population, I wonder why no one has thought about a small licensing fee for cats. It might encourage folks to get their felines fixed ...

    Jewelz: some of the free spay/neuter programs the city used to offer have been eliminated ( for - you guessed it - money reasons ).

  6. #6
    I, personally, don't feel any sympathy for Los Angeles citizens. If they can't afford to license their dogs then how can they afford medical care, food, and so forth??

    It's all part of being a Responsible Dog Owner!


    ---------- Post added at 10:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:15 PM ----------

    Isn't all of California a pretty high cost of living state?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    4,179
    Images
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by PitBullHappenings View Post
    I, personally, don't feel any sympathy for Los Angeles citizens. If they can't afford to license their dogs then how can they afford medical care, food, and so forth??

    It's all part of being a Responsible Dog Owner!

    ---------- Post added at 10:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:15 PM ----------

    Isn't all of California a pretty high cost of living state?
    Totally agree with you - if you cannot afford the license fee, you can't afford a dog.

    And, yes, this is one of the most expensive areas of our fair country.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Madeleinemom View Post

    Quite frankly, I am all for it. As a responsible dog owner, it's the least you can do. In our suburban (L.A.) town, we pay about $16.00 per altered dog; and about $25.00 per intact dog.

    Jewelz: some of the free spay/neuter programs the city used to offer have been eliminated ( for - you guessed it - money reasons ).
    Im all for it as well, maybe i should have mentioned that, Jewelz is licensed and i am a responsible pet owner when coming to the care of her. But im not all for the high prices, i paid them because i have the money, but you know how many broke people are here, and right if they can't afford a licensing fee, then they probably cant afford vet care or any basic care including food and shouldn't own any pet for that matter, but thats not the case. So if the county wants it done so bad, i really think they should take this into concideration when trying to push this on people. LA fees are resonable but like i stated above... $60 a year for an unaltered pet is kinda high.


    Quote Originally Posted by PitBullHappenings View Post

    Isn't all of California a pretty high cost of living state?
    Pretty much, except for the milk like i mentioned LOL

  9. #9
    SnL is against dog licensing...or licensing of anything other than sex offenders. If the government wants to license something...lets start with one thing....and get it right. Leave peoples dogs out of your equation plz.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,577
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Madeleinemom View Post
    If I look at the ever-present feral cat population, I wonder why no one has thought about a small licensing fee for cats. It might encourage folks to get their felines fixed ...
    I would definitely be for that !!
    I think it's been brought up here....but they say it would be very hard to enforce. :rolleyes:

  11. #11
    licensing cats? I really think the government has enough on its plate

    ---------- Post added at 02:08 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:06 PM ----------

    Its not hard to enforce though if you really want to....shoot everyone who dosnt license their cat in the face and drag them out to the curb for everyone to see. bet the registration rate is real high ;) pick your fights (laws) and make sure you win (enforce) em.....

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    michigan, usa
    Posts
    6,844
    Images
    18
    Quote Originally Posted by PitBullHappenings View Post
    I, personally, don't feel any sympathy for Los Angeles citizens. If they can't afford to license their dogs then how can they afford medical care, food, and so forth??

    It's all part of being a Responsible Dog Owner!
    my thoughts exactly.

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Debbie View Post
    The cost of licenses are $15 for a sterilized dog and $100 for an unaltered pet.
    HOLY CRAP! :eek:
    Owner under 60 / animal altered $5
    Owner under 60 / animal unaltered $10
    Owner 60 and over / animal altered $3
    Owner 60 and over / animal unaltered $6
    Library Convenience Fee $2

    So, I would be paying $10 for both dogs. I've never licensed my dogs. Never even thought about it. But technically it's safer. But how do they know? What if the tags come off when ACO picks them up? Theres no chip in them that says they're licensed. Then ACO can do whatever they want with them. I think it's a flawed system.

  14. #14
    For Riverside county:

    License Fees: 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year
    Unaltered Dog $100 $175 $250
    Spayed/Neutered Dog * $16 $25 $35
    Senior (60+) ** $10 $15 $20

    * If not indicated on the rabies certificate, please provide proof of spay/neuter. ** To receive the reduced senior rate, the dog must be spayed or neutered, and proof of age, such as copy of a driver*s license, is required.
    Last edited by RS and Bathory; 03-30-2010 at 01:50 PM. Reason: Formatting

  15. #15
    They should find a better way of trying to rape citizens. What's to keep people from dumping there pets somewhere? Don't see any good out of this. I'm glad I don't live in LA county.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Posts
    194
    Images
    28
    I'm actually in LA county and yes they have to be licensed after the age of 4 months old and have proof of rabies shot. If the dog isn't spayed or neutered yes you have to pay $60 i believe it is but its also against the law if your dog isn't spayed/neutered anyways unless they are show dogs or you have a breeders license.

    "Pit bulls" or any mix of a "pit bull" get free spaying/neutering and microchipped anyways in LA county so basically you are saving money. So to pay the license fee i personally think its not a big deal and just being responsible.

    Unfortunately "Pit bulls" have a negative rep as it is, so i will not give any reason for anyone to be able to take my dogs away from me for even a second.

  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by PitBullHappenings View Post
    I, personally, don't feel any sympathy for Los Angeles citizens. If they can't afford to license their dogs then how can they afford medical care, food, and so forth??

    It's all part of being a Responsible Dog Owner!

    ---------- Post added at 10:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:15 PM ----------

    Isn't all of California a pretty high cost of living state?
    $#@!, its a way of CA making folks get theyre dogs fixxed and making it hell for those that chose not too! hence the reason of jacking up the cost for "unaltered" dogs.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Posts
    194
    Images
    28
    Quote Originally Posted by Laced Wit Game View Post
    $#@!, its a way of CA making folks get theyre dogs fixxed and making it hell for those that chose not too! hence the reason of jacking up the cost for "unaltered" dogs.
    I do agree with you, But what choice do we have? We dont win either way.The law requires us too spay/neuter our dogs and license them. If not, we lose our dogs or have to pay fines. We lose anyways. So its just better off we pay the license and spay/neuter them, or another option just move out of the state or get a breeding license.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    The Golden State
    Posts
    2,326
    Quote Originally Posted by Slowanlow View Post
    SnL is against dog licensing...or licensing of anything other than sex offenders. If the government wants to license something...lets start with one thing....and get it right. Leave peoples dogs out of your equation plz.
    I agree with you! why would they need to license my dog would they like to license my child next or even better myself? same applies with those microchips. I don't mind giving the rabies booster which here in my area we have the option to give the 3 year booster vs a yearly booster but I still don't agree with vaccinations that can last longer then the amount we inject them with so often.

  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by Precious View Post
    I do agree with you, But what choice do we have? We dont win either way.The law requires us too spay/neuter our dogs and license them. If not, we lose our dogs or have to pay fines. We lose anyways. So its just better off we pay the license and spay/neuter them, or another option just move out of the state or get a breeding license.
    move to the county (country,not city limits) keep your dogs out of the public and you should be ok!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Dogs dumped on Los Angeles highway
    By ohmidog! in forum Dog Blogs
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-06-2011, 05:00 AM
  2. Los Angeles seeks out unlicensed dogs
    By ohmidog! in forum Dog Blogs
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-26-2010, 03:51 AM
  3. CA: Cash-strapped Los Angeles going after unlicensed dogs to raise funds
    By Vicki in forum Dog Ordinances & Laws
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-25-2010, 11:45 AM
  4. Church in Los Angeles opens doors to dogs
    By ohmidog! in forum Dog Blogs
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-05-2009, 04:50 AM
  5. Should Pit Bull Owners Be Licensed?
    By ben.peterson in forum Dog Debates
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: 10-31-2009, 09:47 PM

Visitors found this page by searching for:

los angeles pit bull laws

pitbull laws in los angeles

how much to license a pitbulls IN CALIFORNIA

los angeles county pit bull laws

fine for unlicensed dog in california

pit bull laws los angeles

powered by vBulletin los angeles county law libraries

pitbull laws los angeles

west hollywood pit bull laws

california pitbull laws

dog liscense los angeles finelaws against pit bulls in californiadont license your pitbullhow soon do I have to license my dog in kern countyCity of Los Angeles Pit Bull lawdog license pitbull los angeleslog angeles county unlicensed dog penaltiespit bull regulations Los Angelescity of los angeles dog registrationpit bull laws in los angeleswhat is the ordanence of of dogs you can have in los angeles capitbull license in Californiaunregistered dog fine californiadont want to pay dog license fees in la countydid you need pitbull liscend in californiahow much is the fine for an unlicensed dogpitbull law in los angelesare there regulations about owning a pit bull in LosAngelesla county pitbull lawshow to obtain intact dog license in los angeles cafine for unlicensed dog in lalos angeles city owning pit bulls how to register and license your dog in west hollywood capitbull law help in los angelespit bull ordinence hollywood ca

Bookmarks