Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1

    WA-King County Introduces Dangerous Dog Legislation

    Patterson introduces dangerous dog bill in reaction to SeaTac pit bull attack



    Wednesday, June 24, 2009

    Responding to a vicious attack on a 72-year old SeaTac woman by two pit bulls, King County Councilwoman Julia Patterson has introduced legislation restricting owners of dangerous dogs.

    Last fall's attack left the victim in critical condition, with severed ears, a crushed arm and severe wounds across her body.

    "Dogs bites are a serious problem that inflict considerable damage--both physical and emotional--on victims and their families," said Patterson, a SeaTac resident. "In order to prevent these tragic events, King County needs additional tools to protect our communities. I believe this proposed legislation is a great step in ensuring the safety and well-being of both our dogs and our residents."

    The Center for Disease Control reports that dogs bite 4.5 million Americans each year, with one in five dog bites resulting in injuries that require medical attention.

    The proposed legislation would make revisions to King County Code to reflect current Revised Code of Washington provisions and to address public safety concerns regarding dog bites.

    The proposal would create special requirements, higher fees and fines, and disciplinary action for owners of dangerous and potentially dangerous dogs.

    Specifically, the proposed legislation would require owners to:

    Spay or neuter dogs that are dangerous or potentially dangerous.

    Keep those dogs in a proper enclosures. When they leave the property, the animal must be on a leash and muzzled at all times.

    Acquire insurance or surety bonds for dangerous or potentially dangerous dogs.
    Display universally readable signage on their property that they own a dangerous or potentially dangerous dog.

    Microchip their dangerous or potentially dangerous dog.

    Pay higher license fees for their dangerous or potentially dangerous dog.

    Washington state law defines dangerous dogs as dogs that inflicts severe injury on a human being, kills a domestic animal without provocation while the dog is off the owner's property, or has been previously found to be potentially dangerous because of injury inflicted on a human are considered.

    State law defines potentially dangerous dogs as dogs that when unprovoked, bite humans or domestic animals, chases or approaches persons in a menacing fashion, has a known tendency to attack unprovoked, or to cause injury or otherwise threaten the safety of humans or domestic animals.

    The proposed legislation is not breed specific, but applies to all dogs exhibiting dangerous or potentially dangerous behavior.

    Failure to comply with the fines and restrictions will result in additional fees. The county will use the revenue collected from the fines to educate dog owners about responsible pet ownership.

    http://www.federalwaynews.net/articl...ws/story03.txt

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Westminster, Md
    Posts
    150
    Images
    58
    holy crap equality never thought i'd see the day

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Purple View Post
    Patterson introduces dangerous dog bill in reaction to SeaTac pit bull attack



    Wednesday, June 24, 2009

    Responding to a vicious attack on a 72-year old SeaTac woman by two pit bulls, King County Councilwoman Julia Patterson has introduced legislation restricting owners of dangerous dogs.

    Last fall's attack left the victim in critical condition, with severed ears, a crushed arm and severe wounds across her body.

    "Dogs bites are a serious problem that inflict considerable damage--both physical and emotional--on victims and their families," said Patterson, a SeaTac resident. "In order to prevent these tragic events, King County needs additional tools to protect our communities. I believe this proposed legislation is a great step in ensuring the safety and well-being of both our dogs and our residents."

    The Center for Disease Control reports that dogs bite 4.5 million Americans each year, with one in five dog bites resulting in injuries that require medical attention.

    The proposed legislation would make revisions to King County Code to reflect current Revised Code of Washington provisions and to address public safety concerns regarding dog bites.

    The proposal would create special requirements, higher fees and fines, and disciplinary action for owners of dangerous and potentially dangerous dogs.

    Specifically, the proposed legislation would require owners to:

    Spay or neuter dogs that are dangerous or potentially dangerous.

    Keep those dogs in a proper enclosures. When they leave the property, the animal must be on a leash and muzzled at all times.

    Acquire insurance or surety bonds for dangerous or potentially dangerous dogs.
    Display universally readable signage on their property that they own a dangerous or potentially dangerous dog.

    Microchip their dangerous or potentially dangerous dog.

    Pay higher license fees for their dangerous or potentially dangerous dog.

    Washington state law defines dangerous dogs as dogs that inflicts severe injury on a human being, kills a domestic animal without provocation while the dog is off the owner's property, or has been previously found to be potentially dangerous because of injury inflicted on a human are considered.

    State law defines potentially dangerous dogs as dogs that when unprovoked, bite humans or domestic animals, chases or approaches persons in a menacing fashion, has a known tendency to attack unprovoked, or to cause injury or otherwise threaten the safety of humans or domestic animals.

    The proposed legislation is not breed specific, but applies to all dogs exhibiting dangerous or potentially dangerous behavior.

    Failure to comply with the fines and restrictions will result in additional fees. The county will use the revenue collected from the fines to educate dog owners about responsible pet ownership.

    http://www.federalwaynews.net/articl...ws/story03.txt

    No bueno!!!!

Similar Threads

  1. Miami-dade passes dangerous dog registry legislation
    By StopBSL.com in forum Breed Specific Legislation
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-03-2012, 01:04 PM
  2. Dangerous testimony in Monroe County Michigan
    By BAD RAP in forum Dog Blogs
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-27-2011, 10:00 PM
  3. WA: Raccoon distemper suspected in King County
    By Vicki in forum Health & Nutritional Care
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-16-2010, 06:32 PM
  4. Dog Legislation: Summit County Raises Cost of Dog License
    By Chevalier in forum Breed Specific Legislation
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-01-2008, 10:26 PM
  5. Forsythe County, NC - Dangerous Dogs
    By apbtmom76 in forum Breed Specific Legislation
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-27-2008, 10:36 AM

Visitors found this page by searching for:

are pitbulls illegal in king county

king county dog breed restrictions

bully breed laws of washington state

king county dangerous dog

should pitbulls be banned from king county

king county breed ban

seatac dog laws

is pitbull mix legal in king county

king county pit bull laws

washington state laws on pitbull

king county breed restrictions

king countys bsl

washingtin state pitbull laws

pitbull dog lovers king county wa chat

dog breed restriction in king county wa

pit bull legal in king county wa

king county restricted dog breeds

king county laws of pitbulls

King County Dangerous dog code

are pitbulls banned in king county

Pitbull breeders king county washington

pit bulls in king county wa

dangerous dog license king county

bsl law in king county

king county wa pit bull ban

pit bull laws washington state

dangerous dogs act washington state

king county laws on pit bulls

king county breed specific laws

king county wa ordinance vicious dog

illegal dog breeds in king county

south king county wa pitbull rescue

king county wa pit bull laws

pitbull ban in king county wa

seattle pitbull King

Bookmarks